<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>State Agencies</title>
<link>http://handle.tamu.edu/1969.1/2827</link>
<description>Texas state agencies affiliated with Texas A&amp;M University</description>
<item>
<title>Fall 2008, Volume 4, Number 3</title>
<link>http://handle.tamu.edu/1969.1/88063</link>
<description>Fall 2008, Volume 4, Number 3

2 I Saving for dry days&#13;
Aquifer storage and recovery may help&#13;
8 I Research needs to address ASR challenges&#13;
10 I Understanding what lies beneath&#13;
Groundwater critical to Texas water&#13;
14 I Transboundary aquifers&#13;
Southwestern states assess&#13;
18 I Rio Grande project partnerships&#13;
24 I Combating soil erosion&#13;
AgriLife scientist discovering what works for Fort Hood&#13;
28 I Blackland’s flood warning system protects soldiers&#13;
29 I TWRI Briefs

</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Economic Impacts of Salinity Control Measures&#13;
for the Upper Pecos River Basin of Texas</title>
<link>http://handle.tamu.edu/1969.1/88062</link>
<description>Economic Impacts of Salinity Control Measures&#13;
for the Upper Pecos River Basin of Texas

Thompson, William

This report presents the results for Subtask 1.7 of the Pecos River Basin Assessment&#13;
project sponsored by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Texas&#13;
State Soil and Water Conservation Board (TSSWCB). The original objective of Subtask&#13;
1.7 was to measure the economic impact of Tamarix spp. (saltcedar) control along the&#13;
Texas portion of the Pecos River. As work progressed on other hydrologic studies&#13;
associated with this project, the scope of the project shifted to analyze the expected&#13;
economic impacts of implementing potential salinity control measures on the Pecos River&#13;
above Red Bluff Reservoir to decrease salinity levels in water used for irrigation in&#13;
Texas. Scenarios evaluated quantified the economic impact of improving water quality&#13;
used by Texas irrigators to the level of water utilized by the Carlsbad Irrigation District in&#13;
southern New Mexico. The purpose for this evaluation was to see if the overall economic&#13;
impact of producing less salt tolerant, more profitable crops might be significant enough&#13;
to encourage producers to convert current cropping practices to more profitable practices&#13;
not currently useable due to elevated irrigation water salinity levels.&#13;
Between 1970-2005, irrigation storage and delivery data from the Red Bluff Water Power&#13;
Control District (RBWPCD) were analyzed and water delivery from the year 2005 was&#13;
used as a representative level of available irrigation water. Estimates of current cropping&#13;
patterns for the irrigated lands within the seven sub-districts of the RBWPCD were&#13;
established. Data were collected and reviewed for the Carlsbad Irrigation District of New&#13;
Mexico, just up stream from Red Bluff Reservoir, to establish two estimated alternative&#13;
cropping patterns under a reduced salinity environment. The differences in the value of&#13;
farm production between the baseline scenario and the two alternative cropping patterns&#13;
were entered into the Impact Analysis for Planning (IMPLAN) input-output model of the&#13;
six county upper Pecos River Basin to quantify the general economic impact to the local&#13;
economy as a result of changes in current cropping practices.&#13;
As compared to the typical cropping practices, Alternative 1 reduces the more salt&#13;
tolerant cotton acreage and moderately tolerant wheat acreage while increasing the&#13;
acreage of moderately salt sensitive alfalfa. The direct output effect for this alternative&#13;
cropping pattern was $1,446,206; an increase of 120 percent over the current typical&#13;
cropping system. The total economic impact to the local economy was $2,807,166 with a&#13;
net creation of 1.17 full time employee (FTE) jobs. This scenario did not incorporate the&#13;
impacts to local cotton gins and as a result may be a less desirable option.&#13;
Alternative 2 maintains cotton acreage, reduces wheat acres, and increases alfalfa acres as&#13;
compared to typical practices. Compared to Alternative 1, this scenario models one-third&#13;
of the alfalfa acreage, 5.5 times more acres cotton and equal amounts of wheat. The direct&#13;
output effect for this alternative cropping pattern was $815,378; an increase of 130&#13;
percent over the current typical cropping system. The total economic impact was&#13;
$1,588,795, and will generate a net increase of 7.8 FTE jobs.&#13;
2&#13;
The combined effective delivery losses of the Pecos River channel and the sub-district&#13;
delivery infrastructure have averaged 55.5 percent since 1970. Uncertainty stemming&#13;
from weather patterns, annual irrigation water availability, and the delivery losses of the&#13;
current system complicate planning and deter investments by both farmers and irrigation&#13;
districts making a large-scale conversion from current cropping practices to potentially&#13;
more profitable practices less likely. In order to increase the likelihood of cropping&#13;
changes and promote future irrigated agriculture in the basin, a new study of the&#13;
infrastructure improvements for the RBWPCD and the 7 sub-districts is needed; this was&#13;
last done in 1991.&#13;
This study did not measure the impact of increasing available water supplies because it is&#13;
outside the revised scope of the project and is furthermore an unlikely scenario given the&#13;
region’s climate. Tremendous increases in grain prices, fuel, and fertilizer costs in recent&#13;
months can potentially alter economic impacts predicted by this study; these dramatic&#13;
changes have likely changed demand and production functions of several industries. An&#13;
updated analysis is needed to better quantify potential economic impacts under the&#13;
current economic situation.&#13;
The primary focus of this analysis has been on irrigated farm production; however, the&#13;
initial intent was to evaluate the economic impacts of saltcedar control in the riparian&#13;
corridor in general. A large majority of lands in the riparian corridor and watershed are&#13;
classified as rangelands; which can have a significant impact on the watershed’s&#13;
economy. Results of a survey of landowners/managers along the Pecos River can be&#13;
found in appendix 2. This survey was conducted to quantify economic impacts realized&#13;
by landowners along the river as a result of saltcedar treatment along the river. Generally&#13;
speaking, these landowners/operators have had little economic benefit or value from the&#13;
treatment of saltcedar along the Pecos River.

</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Influence of Cropping Systems On Cotton and Corn Yields on the Gulf Coast Prairie.</title>
<link>http://handle.tamu.edu/1969.1/87917</link>
<description>Influence of Cropping Systems On Cotton and Corn Yields on the Gulf Coast Prairie.

Jeter, B. E.

Smith, J. C.

Whiteley, E. L.

24 pg

</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 1961 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Consumers' Image of Broilers.</title>
<link>http://handle.tamu.edu/1969.1/87916</link>
<description>Consumers' Image of Broilers.

Courtenay, Henry V.

Branson, Robert E.

32 pg

</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 1961 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
